Jump to content

Short wide mushroom in TN


Bcherry121

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

can anyone one tell me what type of mushroom is growing in my yard based on the information/pictures below?  I near Nashville, TN. The mushrooms were found in my yard in partially shaded areas under two trees. They grow in clusters and are very short (barely at the level of the top of the grass). They turn brownish as they age and are silimar in color to the back side of falling leaves when they're new. I tried to get a spore print by pressing the gills on white paper but the transfer was mostly clear with a few grayish smudges. I don't think I have a very distinct sense of smell when it comes to mushrooms but they smelled similar to a portebella in my opinion. 

 

I would like to know if these mushrooms are harmful to pets. I have no intentions on eating them. 

 

 

IMG_3177.JPG

IMG_3178.JPG

IMG_3179.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is an example of Clitocybe tarda (=Lepista tarda... aka Lepista sordida). If I'm correct, then the spore print will be pale fleshy-pink, not a lot different than white, best seen on a white background. 

The "Blewit",  Lepista nuda looks similar and has the same color spore print as L. tarda, but with gills that are spaced more closely.

Also, some species of Cortinarius look similar to this. These types have spore print color ranging from rusty-brown to rusty-red to brown. But if this was a Cort, I'd expect to see some webby deposits on the stalk looking kinda rusty from spore drop. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, Bcherry, you won't get a spore print by pressing gills on paper.  You have to leave the mushroom, gills down, for several hours on top of the paper to allow a sufficient number of spores to be released to see the spore print.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And... regarding spore prints, when taken on a porous piece of paper, the paper may absorb moisture form the mushroom, and this can throw off the perceived color of the print. A hard non-porous surface --white and black-- is best. But glossy paper will do. Also, you may take a print on a glass microscope slide and then position the slide over white/black paper to view the print. The drawback with this method is that if the print is not sufficiently thick, it can be difficult to get a good read on color.

Actually, another possibility comes to mind for the ID here... a species of Laccaria. These types have mainly white prints, sometimes with a very pale lilac tint. But, my guess is still L. tarda. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.