Jump to content

Vermonter

Members
  • Content Count

    18
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Vermonter

  • Rank
    Agaricus Newbie

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    East-Central Vermont (Upper Valley)
  • Interests
    nature, communication, music, art, food, movement, stillness

Recent Profile Visitors

168 profile views
  1. This circle was very large as well. I thought it was a line at first, but as my eyes followed it, I realized it was arcing around. I just stumbled across a facebook group called "Clitocybe and Clitocyboid ID and Discussion" and have been looking at photos posted there. Thank you both for your input. I'm definitely going to look for these this summer.
  2. Thank you for elucidating those differences, Dave W. I feel I should admit, with apologies, that I only have photos of these mushrooms—I got neither spore print nor measurements. Photographing them was a bit of an afterthought while harvesting some beautiful Pleurotus pulmonarius nearby. So I'm not sure about the size, however, by drawing on memory and comparing them to nearby leaves in the photos, I would guess that the larger caps were in the neighborhood of 8 cm. If what I've read about C. rivulosa is true, that is about twice the diameter they grow to. I can't rule out Clitocella mundula by spore print, but in the photos I've found identified as C. mundula, I've seen gills that are significantly more decurrent than those of the specimens I photographed—I don't know how variable that trait is. Also, Michael Kuo puts their cap size at 2-5 cm, which again, is smaller than I believe those in my photos were. I have found little about Clitocybe candicans, but I have found reference to two species of Clitocybe with caps up to 10 cm: C. phyllophila and C. parasitica. Perhaps I will have the opportunity to collect additional data this year.
  3. Thank you for your suggestion, DufferinShroomer. I was not familiar with Leucopaxillus albissimus, so I am pleased to become acquainted with another possibility. However, I see some characteristics that don't seem to fit with my find. The stipes of L. albissimus look thicker than those in my photos, and the caps are dry, while those I found seemed slightly moist and translucent. Also Michael Kuo says they favor conifer litter, and I agree with Dave W's assessment that the forest in my photos is hardwood-dominant.
  4. Thank you, Dave W! I hadn't encountered Clitocybe candicans--that seems promising.
  5. I'm trying to ID these photos I took in Vermont last Sept. 21, and I'm pretty sure they are a species of Clitocybe. C. dealbata and C. rivulosa look pretty close, but they are both described as grassland species, while these were growing in a large ring on the forest floor—fairly open, mixed deciduous and conifer. Any suggestions would be much appreciated.
  6. Thanks a lot Dave W! I was initially concerned about the possibility of Pleurocybella porrigens with the white ones, but then learned that the maple tree ruled that out. I read about the illnesses and deaths attributed to P. porrigens and definitely plan to avoid them, even though I know some people continue to eat them.
  7. You're right, troutddicted, it would be awfully big. I was thinking Scleroderma citrinum could get close to that big, but wouldn't have so much of a stem. I was just looking at photos of the species of Calvatia that Dave W specified, and see that cyathiformis seems a very good fit. Sorry to be needlessly alarmist!
  8. I think this looks like an earthball, genus Scleroderma, rather than a puffball. Earthballs are generally considered inedible or poisonous.
  9. Thanks a lot for your input, Dave W! I didn't bother with spore prints, because I had read that the various Pleurotus species have the same range of colors: white-yellow-gray-lilac. Mushroomexpert.com for example has "whitish, grayish, or lilac" for P. pulmonarius and "white to faintly yellowish, or lilac" for P. ostreatus. However, other sources name other overlapping combinations within that range. I'm interested to hear that you have noticed a clear distinction. I really enjoyed the flavors and textures of both of these finds. I harvested some of the late season ones after they had frozen solid, and found them to taste sweeter than before freezing. But the Pleurotus I found most delicious this year were ones I believe to be P. dryinus (posted here)--surprisingly, because they don't have a great reputation as an edible.
  10. Thanks for your input Steve B! I think the white ones are a good fit for P. pulmonarius also. However, when I first posted pictures of them on a local facebook group, a member with a good deal of experience believed them to be P. ostreatus. That's why I'm looking for more opinions.
  11. Here are photos of two finds in Vermont this year. I like to think they are different species, pulmonarius and ostreatus, to explain their drastic differences. The white ones: September 21, maple tree, weather still fairly summery. The brown ones: November 9, log of uncertain variety, weather cold for autumn. I feel confident that the brown are ostreatus, but I believe many would consider these both ostreatus, and attribute the differences to environmental factors. What do you think: different species or the same? Or different subspecies?
  12. Looks like Monotropa uniflora--ghost plant. It's a plant, not a fungus. Rather than getting energy by photosynthesis like most plants, it is parasitic on certain fungi.
  13. Looks like it might be Hygrocybe chlorophana (golden waxycap).
×
×
  • Create New...