Jump to content

vitog

Members
  • Posts

    490
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by vitog

  1. I've never seen any spawn for this mushroom for sale. Since it grows on dead wood, it might be relatively easy to culture; but you would need spores at least to grow it. It is pretty common here in the Pacific Northwest, but not so much in the Midwest. A good source of location information is iNaturalist, which shows a fair number of locations in Wisconsin, but not much in the rest of the Midwest. If you live anywhere near a location where it is found, you could look for it in the fall and collect specimens. I've found it growing on rather skinny dead branches; so it would be possible to cut off a piece of wood with growth on it and use that to start a culture.
  2. It's definitely not a Chanterelle. It appears to be some kind of Lactarius, but I'm not familiar with those that grow around San Francisco.
  3. It will grow outside if the environment and temperature are suitable. Transplanting the mycelium in an indoor kit is no different than planting the various types of spawn available for starting mushroom beds or logs. It probably will not work as well as the commercial spawn because the density of the hyphae in the spawn is a lot higher than the density in transplanted mycelium.
  4. Imleria badia is one that I've never heard of, but a brief internet search indicates that it doesn't occur in western North America. Check MushroomExpert.Com: https://www.mushroomexpert.com/imleria_badia.html. It also is not listed in Pacific Northwest Distributions for Macrofungi: https://www.svims.ca/council/distri.htm#bol.
  5. Another possibility for the buttons is Boletus fibrillosus. I find this one (rarely) at lower elevations in a Douglas-Fir, Western Hemlock forest. As indicated by its genus name, it also has a felty cap and it is part of the B. edulis group. I only find the B. edulis look-alike at higher elevations. I don't know of any guides that list boletes that are poisonous, probably because there are less common species that no one has tested yet.
  6. As discussed in your other post, one possibility for these buttons is Boletus fibrillosus. I find this one (rarely) at lower elevations in a Douglas-Fir, Western Hemlock forest. As indicated by its genus name, it has a felty cap and it is part of the B. edulis group. I only find B. edulis at higher elevations.
  7. These look like very young versions of the ones in the original photos. Are the cap tops felty or smooth? Felty confirms A. mirabilis.
  8. To me, this looks like Aureoboletus mirabilis, which is quite common in the Pacific Northwest.
  9. To me, it looks more like a rotting Lactarius, but Calvet's conclusions apply to this closely related genus as well.
  10. There are at least two books called "Mushrooms of Nepal" found in a quick Google search. Here is a review of one of them (the cheaper one): https://www.mykoweb.com/book_reviews/Mushrooms_of_Nepal.html. Amazon also lists one with the same name for over US$100.
  11. It doesn't look like a Russula. It might be a bolete, because I don't see any gills on the underside of the cap; but it's hard to tell from the photos. We need a clear picture of the whole stem and the bottom of the cap.
  12. This looks like it is infected with Hypomyces chrysospermus. If so, it will probably be impossible to identify.
  13. Dark gills and deliquescing caps indicate some kind of Inky Cap.
  14. These are very likely to be Leucocoprinus birnbaumii, a common mushroom in flower pots. They won't hurt the plants in the pot, but they are reported to be poisonous. So, if there is a possibility that someone or some pet might eat them, it would be wise to remove them as soon as they appear.
  15. Your floor must be damp to grow mushrooms; this is something that will need to be fixed. But you likely have a harvest of oyster mushrooms. Long ago, some of the first oyster mushrooms that I found were growing out of the plywood floor of my old VW minibus.
  16. Dave is probably right; C. tomentosus is a very common fall mushroom near Vancouver.
  17. It would be helpful if all of the photos were right side up.
  18. On a new mulch Lepista is more likely than Cortinarius. Bluets really like conifer yard waste.
  19. They look like the Craterellus tubaeformis that I find in southwestern BC, Canada. I don't know if there is anything similar in eastern North America, but they're quite distinctive where I live. It looks like you also found some Hydnum umbilicatum (another good late season edible).
  20. Looks like a typo: "to pores" = "no pores".
  21. Between 10 and 11, and possibly after 14 (excluding the trumpets), those look like gilled mushrooms; the rest look like typical Chanterelles.
  22. These look like Marasmius oreades, but compare them to the description in https://www.mushroomexpert.com/marasmius_oreades.html.
  23. It's hard to tell from the photo, but it's not a White Chanterelle. It's probably a Lactarius.
  24. RJ Martin, you're more likely to get a response if you post this in the forum: In the field/Identifying mushrooms.
  25. I normally don't bother identifying mushrooms that I'm not familiar with; but this time I used the Matchmaker (Mycomatch) app and entered the little info I could make out from your photo and came up with an 83% match for Boletus coniferarum, which is native to BC. The photo below, from https://calphotos.berkeley.edu/cgi/img_query?enlarge=0000+0000+0114+2716, looks promising.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Guidelines | We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.